Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40558307›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Textbook Outcomes for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection: A Multi-Centre Review.

Skyle Murphy, Christopher Allan, Andrew Barbour, Victoria Donoghue, B Mark Smithers

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Skyle MurphyPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia.
Christopher AllanSchool of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9209-3125
Andrew BarbourPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia.
Victoria DonoghueCancer Alliance Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3055-5782
B Mark SmithersPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs), en-bloc resection with macroscopically negative margins remains the only potentially curative treatment. Textbook outcomes (TOs) are composite measures developed to compare ideal surgical outcomes for complex oncologic resections. The aims of this study were as follows: to define TO for RPS resections; to investigate the impact of treating service and other variables on TO; and to investigate the impact of treating service on achieving a TO. Population-based data from the Queensland Oncology Repository (QOR) was used to perform a retrospective review of all adult patients who underwent resection for primary RPS in Queensland between 2012 and 2022. TO was defined as follows: en-bloc resection; macroscopically negative margins; no unplanned ICU admission, no Clavien-Dindo III or greater complications; hospital length of stay of 14 days or less; no readmission within 30 days; and no 90-day mortality. A TO was achieved in 82 (56.94%) of the 144 patients included in the study. A high-grade histological subtype, the resection of three or more contiguous organs, major vascular resection and treatment outside of a high-volume sarcoma centre (HVSC) were significant negative predictors of achieving TOs (

Indexed as

Retroperitoneal NeoplasmsSarcomaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeprognostic factorsresectionsurgerysurvivaltextbook outcome

Identifiers

PMID40558307
PMCPMC12192472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.