Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40558302›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Molecular Genetics of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review Focused on Clinical Relevance.

Braden Millan, Lauren Loebach, Ruben Blachman-Braun, Milan H Patel, Jaskirat Saini, W Marston Linehan, Mark W Ball

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Braden MillanUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Lauren LoebachUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Ruben Blachman-BraunUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9700-0805
Milan H PatelUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Jaskirat SainiUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
W Marston LinehanUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Mark W BallUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1780-2627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular testing in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has allowed for a better understanding of the biology of both sporadic and hereditary diseases, where genetic testing is currently recommended in the guidelines for a select population with risk factors. Historically, screening, surveillance, and management decisions were based solely on clinicopathologic data; however, we now know that molecular profiling can enhance decision making, altering the treatment plan, approach, or selection of systemic therapy and enhancing the delivery of precision oncologic care. Advances and the increasing availability of next-generation sequencing technologies have improved the identification of germline and somatic variants in key RCC-associated genes. Given the molecular heterogeneity of RCC, these modern methods can identify unique genetic events that occur in a single individual, allowing for distinction between a metachronous tumor from metastases. Separate four-tier systems have been proposed to categorize germline and somatic variants according to their clinical significance, which should be highlighted. Additionally, emerging technologies, such as liquid biopsy, show potential for enhancing precision oncology in RCC. With this said, challenges, such as variant interpretation, ethical considerations, and accessibility, persist. This review examines the molecularly defined RCC, genetic testing methodologies currently available, their current clinical applications, limitations, and future directions.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsClinical RelevanceGenetic TestingHumanscirculating tumor DNAgermline variantsmolecular geneticsnext-generation sequencingpanel testingrenal cell carcinomasomatic variants

Identifiers

PMID40558302
PMCPMC12192110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.