Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40558250›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound in the Era of Z0011: A Model for Predicting High Axillary Disease Burden.

Ashley DiPasquale, Lashan Peiris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashley DiPasqualeDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6683-7300
Lashan PeirisDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-5692-3755

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ACOSOG Z0011 and IBCSG 23-01 trials demonstrated that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) offers no prognostic benefit in breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillae and low disease burden (one to two positive nodes) on sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). However, uncertainty remains regarding the management of patients with clinically negative axillae (cN0) who are found to have suspicious lymph nodes on imaging that are subsequently confirmed positive by biopsy. The current practice often directs these patients to upfront ALND, potentially exposing them to unnecessary surgical morbidity. This study aimed to assess the role of axillary ultrasound in predicting high axillary nodal burden and guiding surgical management. Using the Alberta Cancer Registry, we identified 107 cN0 breast cancer patients from 2010 to 2017 who underwent preoperative axillary ultrasound with positive biopsy followed by ALND. Our findings reveal that 42% of these patients had low axillary nodal burden on final pathology, meeting Z0011 criteria, and might potentially have avoided ALND. Furthermore, axillary ultrasound findings were not predictive of high axillary burden. These results highlight that many patients undergoing upfront ALND based on positive ultrasound-guided biopsy could benefit from SLNB alone. This supports the 2023 NCCN guidelines advocating for more selective use of ALND to minimize overtreatment and associated morbidity.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymph NodesAdultAgedAxillaFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMiddle AgedSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyUltrasonographyaxillary managementbreast cancerultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40558250
PMCPMC12192147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.