Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40558233›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Canadian Recommendations for Germline Genetic Testing of Patients with Breast Cancer: A Call to Action.

Evan Weber, Carlos A Carmona-Gonzalez, Melanie Boucher, Andrea Eisen, Kara Laing, Jennifer Melvin, Kasmintan A Schrader, Sandeep Sehdev, Stephanie M Wong, Karen A Gelmon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. The Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium 2025: Meeting Report.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Evan WeberDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Specialized Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8427-2382
Carlos A Carmona-GonzalezDivision of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6594-4091
Melanie BoucherDepartment of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, PEI Cancer Treatment Centre, Charlottetown, PE C1A 8T5, Canada.
Andrea EisenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8037-9556
Kara LaingCancer Care Program, NL Health Services, St. John's, NL A1B 3V6, Canada.
Jennifer MelvinDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Kasmintan A SchraderHereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7413-4314
Sandeep SehdevDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 1C4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7434-2263
Stephanie M WongJewish General Hospital, Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
Karen A GelmonDepartment of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4111-2757

Funding

AstraZeneca Canada N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes are associated with poor clinical outcomes but also offer an opportunity for more individualized therapeutic pathways. Given increasing knowledge, improvements in germline genetic testing efficiency, and the availability of novel systemic targeted treatment options, the importance of appropriately identifying patients for testing has never been greater. A pan-Canadian expert working group (EWG) consisting of 10 healthcare professionals (HCPs) was convened to review recent international guidelines for germline genetic testing in breast cancer and develop Canadian recommendations. The group identified four clinical questions to address which patients should undergo testing, what approaches should be used, how patients should be counselled, and what steps are needed for implementation. In response to these questions, the EWG agreed upon 12 recommendations that emphasized broader incorporation of germline genetic testing and more standardized, streamlined testing and counselling approaches. The group also offered multiple suggestions to support effective and equitable implementation across Canada. These recommendations provide guidance for HCPs and represent a call to action for the Canadian government and other organizations to support genetic testing pathways, drug access, and ultimately improved outcomes for patients with breast cancer and their families.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationCanadaFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicBRCA1BRCA2breast cancerCanadagermline genetic testingmainstreamingrecommendations

Identifiers

PMID40558233
PMCPMC12191570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.