Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40558145›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Current Clinical Laboratory Challenges to Widespread Adoption of Phage Therapy in the United States.

Ahnika Kline, Ana G Cobián Güemes, Jennifer Yore, Chandrabali Ghose, Daria Van Tyne, Katrine Whiteson, David T Pride

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Enteric populations ofmSphere · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahnika KlineDepartment of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Ana G Cobián GüemesDepartment of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Jennifer YoreDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Chandrabali GhoseBioharmony, Inc., New York, NY 10016, USA.
Daria Van TyneDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7284-0103
Katrine WhitesonDepartment of Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5423-6014
David T PrideDepartment of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The resurgence of phage therapy in Western societies has been in direct response to recent increases in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) that have ravaged many societies. While phage therapy as a concept has been around for over 100 years, it has largely been replaced by antibiotics due to their relative ease of use and their predictability in spectrum of activity. Now that antibiotics have become less reliable due to greater antibiotic resistance and microbiome disruption, phage therapy has once again become a viable and promising alternative, but it is not without its challenges. Much like the development of antibiotics, with deployment of phage therapeutics there will be a simultaneous need for diagnostics in the clinical laboratory. This review provides an overview of current challenges to widespread adoption of phage therapy with a focus on adoption in the clinical diagnostic laboratory. Current barriers include a lack of standard methodology and quality controls for phage susceptibility testing and selection, the absence of phage-antibiotic synergy testing, and the absence of standard methods to assay phage activity on biofilms. Additionally, there are a number of lab-specific administrative and regulatory barriers to widespread phage therapy adoption including the need for pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) assays, methods to account for changes in phages after passaging, an absence of regulatory guidance on what will be required for agency approvals of phages and how broad that approval will apply, and the increased need for lab personnel or automation to account for the work of testing large phage libraries against bacteria isolates.

Indexed as

antibiotic alternativesantibiotic–phage synergybacteriophage therapyclinical microbiology laboratorysynergy testing

Identifiers

PMID40558145
PMCPMC12189272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.