ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025
Clinical impact of real-time androgen receptor alteration monitoring on metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment in real-world settings.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical impact of real-time androgen receptor alteration monitoring on metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment in real-world settings.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Androgen receptor (AR) alterations contribute to resistance against androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study evaluated AR alteration monitoring via liquid biopsy in routine clinical practice. To this end, we enrolled 39 mCRPC patients in a real-world clinical setting and monitored disease progression with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyzed in relation to AR status. AR alterations were detected in 8 of 39 patients (20.5%) at baseline, with five additional cases emerging during progression (total 33.3%). AR-V7 was identified in 12.8%, and AR amplification and/or hotspot mutations in 20.5%. Patients with AR alterations had significantly lower PSA response rates to ARSi (37.5% vs. 80.7%; p = 0.0276). All AR alteration-positive patients experienced disease progression, compared to 34.6% of AR-negative cases. PFS was significantly shorter in AR alteration-positive patients (11 vs. 52 months; p = 0.001), while OS showed a non-significant trend toward shorter survival (41 vs. 74 months; p = 0.0619). Univariate analysis confirmed AR alterations as an independent predictor of PFS (p = 0.0035). This real-world study demonstrates that AR monitoring via liquid biopsy predicts treatment response and progression in mCRPC. Continuous monitoring is essential, as AR alterations emerge over time. Patients with AR alterations have poorer ARSi responses and shorter PFS, emphasizing the need for adaptive treatment strategies in real-world clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.