ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025
Preeclampsia and risk of breast cancer: A longitudinal cohort study of tumor histology.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preeclampsia and risk of breast cancer: A longitudinal cohort study of tumor histology.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with preeclampsia have a reduced risk of breast cancer, but it is not clear if the protective effect extends to all types of breast tumors. Our objective was to determine the association of preeclampsia with ductal, lobular, and other breast cancer histology. We conducted a longitudinal cohort study of 1,459,716 patients who had pregnancies between 1989 and 2022 in Quebec, Canada. The main exposure measure was preeclampsia. The outcome was breast cancer, including ductal, lobular, and other histological subtypes diagnosed up to 34 years after childbirth. We included in situ, localized invasive, and metastatic breast cancer. We used Cox regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between preeclampsia and breast cancer histology, adjusted for maternal characteristics. Patients with preeclampsia had a lower incidence of breast cancer than patients without preeclampsia (82.1 vs. 111.7 per 100,000 person-years). Preeclampsia was associated with a 16% lower risk of breast cancer compared with no preeclampsia (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.89), including a 14% lower risk of ductal (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.93) and 31% lower risk of lobular tumors (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.87). The protective association was present for in situ, localized invasive, and metastatic breast tumors. Preeclampsia was not associated with mucinous, medullary, papillary, or other breast cancer histology. We conclude that patients with preeclampsia are less likely to develop ductal and lobular breast cancer than patients with normotensive pregnancies, but do not have a reduced risk of other types of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.