Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40557964›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on sexual and reproductive health2025

Do Women Feel Unprepared for the Experience of an Intrauterine Device Insertion: Findings From an Australian Study.

Cassandra Caddy, Meredith Temple-Smith, Jacqueline Coombe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cassandra CaddyMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Meredith Temple-SmithMelbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jacqueline CoombeMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

University of Melbourne Early Career Researcher Grant 2022ECR097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S): The experience of pain during intrauterine insertion can be highly variable, ranging from none to severe. The objective of this study was to explore the experience of intrauterine device (IUD) insertion from the perspective of contraceptive users. STUDY

designWe conducted a qualitative study using individual semi-structured Zoom interviews with women living in Australia. We recruited participants from a larger study exploring the information needs of contraceptive users. We audio-recorded and transcribed interviews and thematically analyzed the data.

resultsEighteen women described their experiences of IUD insertion. Although most participants described mild to moderate pain, some described severe pain exceeding their expectations and reported being unprepared for this experience. In some cases, these experiences had unexpected short and long-term consequences such as impacts on intimate relationships and fear of other gynecological procedures.

conclusionIntrauterine device users should be informed of the range of pain experiences that may occur during insertion, including the risk of a vasovagal reaction, and all pain management options available to them. Experiences of pain during insertion did not appear to deter contraceptive users' continued IUD use or planned future use.

Indexed as

Intrauterine DevicesPainAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchYoung Adultcontraceptionintrauterine devicelong‐acting reversible contraceptionpainqualitative

Identifiers

PMID40557964
PMCPMC12421085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.