Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40557921›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Martik Chatterjee, Xin Yi Yu, Noah K Brady, Connor Amendola, Gabriel C Hatto, Robert D Reed

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. eLife · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martik Chatterjee *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4689-6212
Xin Yi Yu *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States.
Noah K BradyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States.
Connor AmendolaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States.
Gabriel C HattoDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States.
Robert D ReedDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States.

Funding

National Science Foundation IOS-1753559National Science Foundation IOS-2128164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect wings, a key innovation that contributed to the explosive diversification of insects, are recognized for their remarkable variation and many splendid adaptations. Classical morphological work subdivides insect wings into several distinct domains along the anteroposterior (AP) axis, each of which can evolve relatively independently to produce the myriad forms we see in nature. Important insights into AP subdivision of insect wings come from work in

Indexed as

ButterfliesInsect ProteinsTranscription FactorsWings, AnimalAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterInsect ProteinsTranscription Factorsbroad-winged insectbutterflyevolutionary biologyIroquois geneswing domain

Identifiers

PMID40557921
PMCPMC12194122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.