Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40557914›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cardiology2025

The role of imaging in risk assessment for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Divya Verma, Rodolfo A Estrada, Sandeep Sahay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Divya VermaDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Rodolfo A EstradaDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio.
Sandeep SahayDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThere are several multifactorial risk assessment tools used to predict mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). These tools are also used to guide clinical decision-making including changes in therapy and referrals for transplantation. While the prominent driver of morbidity and mortality in PAH is right ventricular failure, most available risk assessment tools do not include parameters specific to right ventricular structure or function. Several cardiac imaging parameters are known to be associated with survival and may enhance the predictive ability of existing risk scores. RECENT

findingsThis review compiles the existing literature surrounding the improved predictive power of existing risk assessment tools when combined with echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings. The review also discusses scenarios in which imaging findings may influence clinical decision making outside of risk scores. SUMMARY: Decision making in PAH is complex and multifaceted. Cardiac imaging is an important component in the management of PAH and should be considered carefully and in conjunction with existing risk assessment tools.

Indexed as

Hypertension, PulmonaryPulmonary Arterial HypertensionClinical Decision-MakingEchocardiographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRisk Assessmentcardiovascular magnetic resonanceechocardiographyimagingpulmonary arterial hypertensionrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID40557914
PMCPMC12337924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.