ArticleBritish journal of haematology2025
Large-cell transformation of mycosis fungoides: Patterns of care and patient outcomes.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Large-cell transformation of mycosis fungoides: Patterns of care and patient outcomes.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large-cell transformation of mycosis fungoides (LCTMF) is rare, histologically distinct, with an aggressive clinical course; yet is not recognised as an independent entity in classification systems nor in staging systems for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome (MF/SS). Herein, the patterns of care and survival outcomes for patients with LCTMF are described, with prognosis compared to published data of non-transformed MF/SS. Eligibility required clinicopathological diagnosis of LCTMF (1/1/1990-31/10/2021), managed at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre. Eighty-three patients were eligible. Median follow-up was 8.0 years. At the time of LCTMF, 36% had early-stage MF (IA-IIA), 76% had cutaneous-only LCTMF. The most common first-line treatments were localised radiotherapy (48%) and multiagent chemotherapy (23%). Median overall survival (OS) from LCTMF diagnosis was 3.5 years (95% [confidence interval] CI: 2.2-8.2). Three prognostic groups of LCTMF were identified: unifocal cutaneous only, multifocal cutaneous only and extracutaneous (median OS: 4.6, 2.5 and 1.1 years, respectively; p = 0.005). Unfavourable prognostic factors were advanced age and extracutaneous LCTMF. In conclusion, treatment pathways for patients with LCTMF were varied, and prognosis was poor, despite >1/3 having early-stage MF. However, differences in prognosis were suggested, with unifocal cutaneous LCTMF associated with greater OS. Given prognostic differences from MF/SS, consideration to include LCTMF in staging systems is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.