Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40557606›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2025

Centering Impact and Equity in the Next 50 Years of Eating Disorder Research.

Megan E Mikhail, C Blair Burnette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Centering Impact and Equity in the Next 50 Years of Eating Disorder Research.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Megan E MikhailDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9262-3683
C Blair BurnetteDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5003-5856

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 50 years, there has been a significant increase in research on eating disorders, which is encouraging and necessary given the substantial mortality, morbidity, and personal and societal costs of these common conditions. However, improvements in prevention, treatment access, and outcomes have been slow, and research priorities have not always been aligned with the needs and interests of affected communities. In this commentary, we call on the field to think critically about how to maximize not only the volume but also the real-world impact of the next 50 years of eating disorder research. In particular, we highlight the importance of creating a research ecosystem that nurtures methodological diversity and centers collaborative, participatory research in partnership with people with lived experience. We also underscore the importance of conducting inclusive research that makes space for the full diversity of eating disorder presentations and the people who experience them. Ultimately, we argue that creativity and commitment will be required along with shifts in training, academic incentives, and broader structures to realize the full potential of research to enhance the lives of those with eating disorders.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchFeeding and Eating DisordersHumansResearchdisordered eatingeating disordersequitylived experienceresearch priorities

Identifiers

PMID40557606
PMCPMC12501547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.