ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2025
Evolution of Pore Volume During Stripping of Lithium Metal in Solid-State Batteries Observed with Operando Dilatometry.
Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic Insights Into Instability From Single Void Dynamics at the Lithium Metal-Solid Electrolyte Interface.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Tracking Interphase Growth at Alloy Anode Interfaces in Sulfide Solid-State Batteries.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Evolution of Pore Volume During Stripping of Lithium Metal in Solid-State Batteries Observed with Operando Dilatometry.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lithium metal solid-state batteries are prone to pore formation at the interface between the metal anode and the solid electrolyte during discharge, when the applied current density exceeds the lithium vacancy diffusion rate in the metal. This leads to contact loss and eventually battery failure. To better understand the mechanisms of pore formation at the anode interface, operando information on the total pore volume is essential. In this study, a dedicated dilatometric measurement setup for operando tracking of pore volume is presented and validated. The working principle of this method is demonstrated in a case study on symmetric lithium-garnet cells. The combination of the dilatometric data with galvanostatic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (GEIS) allows for a systematic study of pore formation in any metal solid-state battery. To quantify this process, the vacancy injection ratio is introduced, as a measure of the fraction of lithium atom sites that remain empty during stripping. These experimental results reveal that, under the conditions applied, pore formation begins immediately upon stripping, even before becoming detectable by GEIS. Furthermore, it is shown that pores initially grow laterally near the surface before deepening at later stages. Based on these findings, a pore formation and growth mechanism is proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.