ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2025
Comparative disease burden of early-onset and late-onset type 2 diabetes in the U.S.: Evidence from NHANES 2003-2018.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Individual preferences for the design of a health coaching-based lifestyle promotion program among middle-aged adults in Hong Kong: a discrete choice experiment.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo estimate the disease burden of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in early-onset (age < 40) and late-onset (age ≥ 40) in the U.S.
methodsData obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2018. Prevalence, number, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in early-onset and late-onset T2D were assessed.
resultsThere was a clear and steady upward trend in early-onset T2D, although the prevalence and number of late-onset T2D were higher than early-onset. The average loss of DALYs per capita (DALYs/per) in the early-onset T2D was higher than that in the late-onset. DALYs/per is higher in males than females in both early- and late-onset T2D groups. People living at or below the poverty line and those with education of high school and below had a higher DALYs/per of early-onset T2D. Among individuals with early-onset T2D, the DALYs/per loss was higher in the non-obesity group.
conclusionThere was a clear upward trend in the prevalence of early-onset T2D, and the loss of DALYs/per in early-onset T2D was higher than that in late-onset T2D. The attribution risk factors, like sex, education levels, income levels, and body mass index, for the burden of early-onset T2D varied, and measures need to be taken to target different populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.