Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40557338›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2025

Sustainability in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: An Eco-Audit of the Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Pathway.

Zahra Ahmed, Alexander Zargaran, Andia Soltani, Sara Sousi, David Zargaran, Yazan Al-Ajam, Shadi Ghali, Afshin Mosahebi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zahra AhmedFrom the University College London, London, United Kingdom!
Alexander ZargaranFrom the University College London, London, United Kingdom!
Andia SoltaniDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Sara SousiFrom the University College London, London, United Kingdom!
David ZargaranFrom the University College London, London, United Kingdom!
Yazan Al-AjamDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Shadi GhaliDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Afshin MosahebiFrom the University College London, London, United Kingdom!

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to perform process mapping and life cycle assessment of patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction to identify actionable carbon hotspots, decrease emissions, and increase sustainability. Background: Abdominal wall reconstruction is a procedure requiring input from multiple specialities and is often performed on complex multimorbid patients requiring a high level of care, the environmental impact of which has yet to be explored. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 30 patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction at a single center. Process mapping and life-cycle analyses were performed for surgical and inpatient stay, as well as preoperative and outpatient evaluation including facilities, consumables, medical gases, equipment, food and linen, and travel. Estimates for carbon dioxide emissions were generated for each stage, with variability considered, as well as potential areas for savings. Results: This study estimated the carbon footprint of a patient undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction surgery to be approximately 420.56 kgCO Conclusions: This is the first study to estimate the carbon footprint of a surgical pathway for complex patients, using abdominal wall reconstruction as an example. Strategies to combat the impact of carbon emissions and increase sustainability included greater implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols to reduce inpatient stay, improved accuracy of waste segregation, and continued use of total intravenous anesthesia.

Indexed as

abdominal wall reconstructioncarbon footprinthealthcare sustainabilitylifecycle assessmentprocess mappingsustainability

Identifiers

PMID40557338
PMCPMC12185097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.