ArticleTobacco use insights2025
Analyzing Smoking Challenges in Bladder Cancer Patients From an Online Forum: A Contemporary Qualitative Study of Peer Support and Cessation Motivators.
Article in Tobacco use insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Motivators and barriers to smoking cessation among bladder cancer (BC) survivors remain largely understudied. A novel approach to exploring these challenges is through analyzing user discourse on internet forums, which offer valuable insights into patients' lived experiences. Objective: To qualitatively examine smoking cessation in former and current smokers with connections to BC using Reddit. Methods: All posts on the subreddit "r/stopsmoking" was queried for "bladder cancer" and its MeSH terms. Threads with anecdotal experiences on BC and smoking were included for analysis. Grounded theory was used to inductively analyze the original posts. Two independent reviewers arranged original posts into individual excerpts to identified preliminary themes. These categories were refined to derive resultant concepts. Results: 145 total discussions (17 BC original posts by former and current smokers and 128 reponses) were included. Grounded theory identified 4 themes: coping with BC, fluctuating motivators, resilience and determination amidst smoking relapse, emotional release. Three resultant concepts were formed: BC impacts quality of life, BC experience serves as a motivator for smoking cessation, and successful smoking cessation relies on a robust support network. Conclusions: This study unveils BC experiences without judgment apprehension. The diagnosis of BC and patients' shared experiences may serve as catalysts to quit smoking. These themes and concepts on BC's impact on smoking can assist clinicians to have tailored cessation discussions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.