ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Real-world pharmacovigilance reports of hepatitis A inactivated and hepatitis B (recombinant) vaccine: insights from disproportionality analysis of the vaccine adverse event reporting system.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug-associated oropharyngeal infection: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA adverse event reporting system database.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Post-marketing safety surveillance of tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine: a disproportionality analysis of the vaccine adverse event reporting system (2015-2025).Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Disproportionality analysis of methylphenidate-associated adverse events in pediatric patients using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: overall signals and stratification by gender and dosage form.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatitis A Inactivated and Hepatitis B (Recombinant) Vaccine (Hep AB) was approved for use in 2001. Hep AB demonstrates satisfactory efficacy in protecting the public from hepatitis virus infections. However, there is a lack of recent real-world report on its adverse events (AEs). Methods: We retrieved US AE reports related to Hep AB vaccination from VAERS for the period 2020-2024. We used four algorithms: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) and Multi-Item Gamma-Poisson Shrinkage (MGPS) to examine AE signals. The ROR and PRR algorithms have higher sensitivity but lower specificity. However, BCPNN and MGPS compensate for this limitation. Combining all four algorithms helps reduce false-positive signals. In addition to the general population, we also focused on reports stratified by gender. Results: We retrieved 1,640 eligible reports from VAERS. In the general population, we identified two AE signals at the System Organ Classification (SOC) level. Additionally, we found 39 AE signals at the Preferred Term (PT) level. Among these, endocrine disorders were identified for the first time as AE signals. In the subsequent gender stratified analysis, more AE signals were identified in females compared to males. Notably, signals for endocrine disorders (autoimmune thyroiditis and Graves' disease) were detected in females, whereas no such signals were found in males. Conclusions: We conducted a comprehensive examination of the recent AE reports for Hep AB and identified unexpected AEs, particularly in females. These findings will provide valuable insights into future evidence-based surveillance strategies of Hep AB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.