Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40557315›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025

Clinical and diagnostic insights into brucellar arthritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Qiangsheng Feng, Yuejuan Song, Yuan Xing, Xiaoqin Ha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qiangsheng FengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou, China.
Yuejuan SongDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou, China.
Yuan XingDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou, China.
Xiaoqin HaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the diagnostic value of etiological and serological testing in distinguishing brucellosis arthropathy from other inflammatory joint diseases. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 68 cases of brucellosis arthropathy diagnosed between 2012 and 2024, alongside 60 non-infected controls. Bacterial cultures were performed using blood, joint fluid-blood bottle culture, and joint tissue samples, with microbial identification via VITEK Compact-II or MALDI-TOF MS. Clinical features, serological results (Standard Agglutination Test [SAT] and Rose Bengal Test [RBT]), and imaging findings were analyzed. The diagnostic performance of biomarkers was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Among the 68 cases, 22 (32.4%) were confirmed by bacterial culture, with Brucella melitensis identified as the causative agent. Joint fluid-blood bottle culture was the most effective method (62.2%), with a mean detection time of 74.8 ± 17.9 hours (range: 41-110 hours) in aerobic bottles. Blood culture and joint tissue culture yielded positive results in 40.9% and 4.5% of cases, respectively. Brucellosis arthropathy accounted for 7.5% of total brucellosis cases, predominantly affecting males (67.6%) with a median age of 43.1 ± 13.2 years. Brucellosis arthropathy infection median time were 90[30,343] days. The knee joint was the most commonly affected site (64.7%), followed by the hip (20.6%) and sacroiliac joints (10.3%). Imaging revealed septic arthritis (20.7%), joint effusion (31.0%), bone destruction (12.0%), degenerative changes (10.3%), and prosthetic joint infection (6.9%). The sensitivity for Brucella culture, SAT, and RBT were 69.7%, 87.7%, and 91.2%, respectively, with a combined sensitivity of 92.6%. ROC analysis identified CRP as a highly sensitive and specific biomarker (cutoff: 4.07 mg/mL; sensitivity: 84.2%, specificity: 72.2%; Z = 5.568, p < 0.001). All patients were treated with doxycycline and rifampicin for 3 months, with 34% requiring surgical intervention. The prognosis was satisfactory in all cases. Conclusions: Brucellosis arthropathy, often chronic and predominantly affecting the knee and hip joints, presents with septic arthritis, joint effusion, and bone destruction on imaging. Diagnosis can be effectively achieved through aerobic joint fluid-blood bottle culture, SAT, and RBT. Early diagnosis and combined medical-surgical management yield favorable outcomes.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousBrucella melitensisBrucellosisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersFemaleHumansJointsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSerologic TestsYoung AdultBiomarkersbrucella melitensisbrucellosis arthropathyclinical characteristicsinfection biomarkerjoint fluid-blood bottle culture

Identifiers

PMID40557315
PMCPMC12185485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.