ArticleACS photonics2025
Quantifying the Accuracy and Precision of the Transition Dipole Moment Alignment from Realistic Angular Emission Data.
Article in ACS photonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tunable Angular Light Emission of Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystal Thin Films via Solution-Processed Substrate Treatment.ACS nanoscience Au · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optoelectronic device efficiency depends on the effective orientation of its photoluminescent transition dipole moment(s). This orientation is typically quantified indirectly by fitting the angular emission pattern of a material. However, the accuracy and uncertainty of this procedure are unknown, and thus, the predicted efficiency of a device has the potential to be extremely inaccurate. Here, we quantify the inherent accuracy and precision of finding the orientation of transition dipole moment(s). We created artificial data sets of varying transition dipole moment alignments, refractive indices, and thicknesses and used statistical models to determine the fit accuracy and associated confidence intervals. The inherent confidence intervals are inconsistent across transition dipole moment alignments and samples: uncertainty increases for more horizontally aligned dipoles and for higher refractive indices, meaning that quantum-confined semiconductor films will inherently have a less precise fit. We then showed that accurately fitting the transition dipole moment alignment requires adequate knowledge of the film parameters or computationally expensive fitting methods. Finally, we incorporated realistic nonidealities into our generated data sets that led to extremely inaccurate predictions of the true transition dipole moment alignment, with some cases showing 10-30° difference from the true angle. To address this, we developed a new weighting mask that reduced these inaccuracies to be within a few degrees for most cases. Through this work, we provided a framework to more accurately quantify the transition dipole moment alignment and the uncertainty of the associated fit, enabling better predictions of material properties and future device performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.