Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40557268›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Comparison of 2.0 mg/kg/day and 0.5 mg/kg/day immunosuppressive dexamethasone protocols as initial treatment for dogs with MUO.

Miroslav Prikryl, Sara Ferrini, Petr Srenk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miroslav PrikrylDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Vetino Jaggy Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Sara FerriniSezione di Clinica Medica - Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Torino, Italy.
Petr SrenkDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Vetino Jaggy Prague, Prague, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Canine meningoencephalitis of unknown origin (MUO) is a common immune-mediated neurological disorder primarily treated with corticosteroids. However, the optimal initial dosing regimen remains unclear. Method: This prospective, randomized, parallel-group study evaluated the short-term clinical efficacy and gastrointestinal (GIT) safety of two intravenous dexamethasone dosing protocols (0.5 mg/kg/day vs. 2.0 mg/kg/day) in dogs diagnosed with MUO. Neurological and GI scoring systems were used to assess outcomes over a four-day hospitalization period. Results: Sixty dogs were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the 0.5 mg/kg/day ( Discussion: This study has not identified a significant difference in short term outcome using different dosing protocols of dexamethasone in dogs diagnosed with MUO. Further studies with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods are warranted to investigate the potential dose-dependent effects of dexamethasone on both neurological and GIT outcomes.

Indexed as

corticosteroidsdexamethasonegastrointestinalmeningoencephalitisMUO

Identifiers

PMID40557268
PMCPMC12185283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.