ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Prognostic value of combining preoperative immune-inflammatory-nutritional index and tumor biomarkers in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune-inflammatory-fibrinogen score as a novel prognostic biomarker in patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy: a multicenter study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Integration of objective nutritional status and tumor burden predicts 5-year survival after gastric cancer surgery: a multicenter real-world study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Article
- Correlation analysis of clinical efficacy and prognosis of endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer with peripheral blood indexes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Preoperative PNI-dNLR Score as Predicting Long-Term Survival in Older Adults Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Lymphocyte to C-reactive protein ratio as a novel inflammatory biomarker: Validation and clinical relevance as an independent prognostic factor in cholangiocarcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) patients frequently face the debilitating comorbidity of malignant cachexia, a condition that consistently forecasts a dismal prognosis. Early diagnosis of cachexia and timely prediction of survival outcomes are essential for them. Here, we aimed to construct an immune-inflammatory-nutritional-tumor-marker (IINTM) prognostic score for GC, and further scrutinize its clinical relevance in early forecasting the cachexia. Method: A total of 1,101 GC patients underwent curative surgical were incorporated in our study, and they were evaluated by the Computed Tomography (CT) of skeletal muscle mass at third lumbar spine plane levels (SMI-L3). Using restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis, we examined associations between prognosis and nutritional indices, including the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII). The IINTM score was constructed by the multivariate Cox analysis and evaluated by the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and area under the ROC (AUC). Results: We identified striking discrepancies in immunonutrition profiles and prognoses between cachexia and non-cachexia GC patients. Patients with cachexia had worse prognosis and lower SMI-L3 scores than those without cachexia. The IINTM score, incorporating PNI, SII, body mass index (BMI), NRS2002, serum albumin, platelet, D-dimer, CEA, and CA199, exhibited a high concordance index (C-index) of 0.784, underscoring its robust predictive efficacy. Most crucially, IINTM score demonstrated substantial diagnostic value for cachexia, with an AUC of 0.858, denoting its high degree of accuracy. Conclusion: The IINTM score could be a reliable tool and precisely predict the cachexia and prognosis for GC patients. Our findings provide novel insights into the role of immune-inflammatory-nutrition, tumor marker and cachexia in GC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.