Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40557230›Full record

ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2025

Pregnancy outcomes in Fontan circulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tanawat Attachaipanich, Suthinee Attachaipanich, Kotchakorn Kaewboot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Fontan and pregnancy: walking a tightrope.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tanawat AttachaipanichDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Suthinee AttachaipanichGraduate School of Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Kotchakorn KaewbootDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1492-4551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fontan surgery outcomes have significantly improved, leading to an increased number of patients surviving into adulthood. However, data on pregnancy outcomes in this population remain limited. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across four databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL, from inception to September 25, 2024, without language restrictions. Studies involving pregnancies in women with Fontan circulation that reported maternal or neonatal outcomes were included. Case series and case reports were excluded. Results: A total of 18 studies met the eligibility criteria, including 400 pregnant women with Fontan circulation and 1260 pregnancies. An increase in maternal arrhythmias was observed, with a pooled incidence of 6.59% (95% CI 3.22%-10.83%), all of which were supraventricular tachycardia. The pooled incidence of maternal heart failure was 3.71% (95% CI 0.94%-7.67%), with no report of maternal mortality. Preterm delivery was common, with a pooled incidence of 57.31% (95% CI 40.19%-73.66%). Furthermore, the pooled incidence of neonatal mortality was 4.38% (95% CI 2.08%-7.23%), mainly due to complications from preterm births. Conclusion: Pregnancy in women with Fontan circulation is associated with maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. Preconception counseling and multidisciplinary care are essential for supporting pregnancy planning, ensuring careful monitoring, and improving pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

CongenitalFontan procedureheart defectspregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40557230
PMCPMC12184137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.