Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40557197›Full record

ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2025

Efficacy and safety of nirsevimab for preventing respiratory syncytial virus infection in infants: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis encompassing 11,001 participants.

Mohammad Tanashat, Mohamed Abuelazm, Almothana Manasrah, Obieda Altobaishat, Noor M Masadeh, Mohamed Abouzid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammad TanashatFaculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8819-1803
Mohamed AbuelazmFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2514-0689
Almothana ManasrahMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6266-4991
Obieda AltobaishatFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7213-0507
Noor M MasadehJordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Mohamed AbouzidDepartment of Physical Pharmacy and Pharmacokinetics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8917-671X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is recognized as the leading cause of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) and a major contributor to newborn hospitalizations. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of nirsevimab in preventing RSV infections among infants. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of nirsevimab in healthy infants born at varying gestational ages during their first RSV season. Methods: Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched electronic databases-PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science-to identify relevant studies published up to March 2025. Results: We included three studies with 11,001 participants. Nirsevimab was significantly associated with decreased hospitalization for LRTI due to RSV (risk ratio [RR]: 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13, 0.33; Conclusion: Nirsevimab shows promise in preventing RSV infections and hospitalizations, warranting further study on its practicality and cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

Infantslower respiratory tract infectionnirsevimabpreventionrespiratory syncytial virus

Identifiers

PMID40557197
PMCPMC12184130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.