Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40557133›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Combating weight-stigmatization in online spaces: the impacts of body neutral, body positive, and weight-stigmatizing TikTok content on body image and mood.

Raeanna Kilby, Kristin D Mickelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raeanna KilbyArizona State University, New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, Glendale, AZ, United States.
Kristin D MickelsonArizona State University, New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, Glendale, AZ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media movements centered on body positivity and body neutrality both encourage healthy attitudes toward the physical body; however, these movements are conceptually distinct and may have unique influences on body image. This study examined how brief exposure to different types of body acceptance and weight-stigmatizing content affects body image and mood. Participants consisted of women and gender-diverse individuals (N = 326) who completed an online survey and were randomly assigned to view one of four TikTok video compilations: body neutrality, body positivity, weight-stigmatizing, or travel (control) content. Exposure to body positivity and body neutrality content was associated with improvements in functional appreciation, self-objectification, body dissatisfaction, and negative affect. Moreover, although participants across body-focused conditions reported thinking about their appearance to a similar extent, those in the body-positive and body-neutral groups reported more frequent positive appearance-related thoughts than those in the weight-stigmatizing or control conditions. Importantly, differences emerged between the two body acceptance conditions, such that body neutrality was uniquely effective in reducing self-objectification relative to weight-stigmatizing content, while body positivity significantly enhanced positive affect. Moderation analyses revealed marginal interactions, suggesting that the effect of content on body dissatisfaction varied by gender identity, while positive affect varied by perceived body silhouette. Overall, these findings indicate that body-positive and body-neutral content on TikTok may serve as beneficial alternatives to weight-stigmatizing media, though each approach may yield distinct benefits especially in consideration of individual identity characteristics.

Indexed as

body neutralitybody positivityself-objectification, mood, body imagesocial mediaTikTokweight-stigma

Identifiers

PMID40557133
PMCPMC12185992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.