ReviewOpen veterinary journal2025
Current trends and challenges in the management of foot and mouth disease in Saudi Arabia: A review.
Review in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions Regarding Mini Implants Among Orthodontic Practitioners in the Kurdistan Region: Cross-Sectional Study.Online journal of public health informatics · 2026Article
- Robust cross-immunity against a heterologous field strain of foot-and-mouth disease virus achieved in small ruminants following commercial vaccination in Jordan.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review explores the etiology, transmission, molecular epidemiology, economic impact, diagnostics, control measures, inactivated vaccine challenges, global epidemiological trends, and recommendations for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), with a focus on Saudi Arabia. The O/ME -SA topotype is the predominant strain in the region, with high genetic similarity (88%-98%) to strains in neighboring countries, highlighting significant cross-border transmission. Despite FMD being an endemic disease, comprehensive molecular epidemiological studies in Saudi Arabia remain limited. FMD caused by the foot and mouth disease virus poses substantial economic burdens and affects various livestock species. Its persistence in Saudi Arabia is due to inadequate vaccination coverage, weak surveillance systems, and logistical challenges. Insufficient outbreak response, vaccine hesitancy, and gaps in public awareness further contribute to disease spread. Transmission occurs through direct animal contact and indirect routes, with the virus surviving in the contaminated environment for up to 14 days, indicating indirect transmission, representing 70% of cases and a key factor in sustaining outbreaks. Diagnosis primarily relies on sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), with RT-PCR offering higher sensitivity and specificity. Integrating these with advanced techniques like reverse-transcription LAMP, could enhance the rapid detection and response. Control measures include vaccination, surveillance, and movement restrictions, with efforts to improve vaccine thermostability and efficacy. Strengthening disease data collection is essential for monitoring trends and improving vaccine selection. The key recommendations for Saudi Arabia include enhancing vaccine development, improving surveillance systems, conducting vaccine matching studies, and adopting a One Health approach. Collaboration with international organizations, public education, and research into new strategies and technologies is crucial for effective FMD control and prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.