Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40557087›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025

Dina E M Rashad, Ahmed S A Sosa, Seham F Shehata, Karima Gh M Mahmoud, Mohamed M M El-Sokary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dina E M RashadTheriogenology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.
Ahmed S A SosaAnimal Reproduction and Artificial Insemination Department, Veterinary Research Institute, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Seham F ShehataDepartment of Animal Wealth Development, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.
Karima Gh M MahmoudAnimal Reproduction and Artificial Insemination Department, Veterinary Research Institute, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Mohamed M M El-SokaryTheriogenology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), a commonly used plasticizer and endocrine disruptor, has been implicated in various reproductive disorders in farm animals. However, its effects on camel reproduction, particularly sperm function, have not been studied. Given the unique reproductive physiology of camels, understanding DEHP's impact on sperm quality is crucial. Investigating these effects could provide insights into potential fertility risks and contribute to improved reproductive management strategies for camel breeding programs. Aim: This study evaluated the effects of DEHP on camel sperm quality, specifically focusing on motility, viability, mitochondrial activity, plasma membrane integrity, and sperm binding to both zona pellucida and oviduct epithelial cells. Methods: Camel spermatozoa were retrieved from the epididymis and exposed to four concentrations of DEHP (0, 10, 25, and 50 µM) to evaluate its impact on spermatozoa function. Progressive sperm movement was examined, followed by assessments of viability using SYBR 14/PI staining and mitochondrial membrane potential using Mito-Tracker Green fluorescence staining. Membrane integrity was evaluated using the Hypo-Osmotic Swelling Test. Additionally, functional competence was assessed using zona pellucida and oviduct epithelial cell binding assays. Results: DEHP exposure resulted in a dose-dependent decline in sperm functionality. Sperm motility decreased from 61.6.5% in the control group to 43% at 50 µM DEHP. Similarly, mitochondrial activity and membrane integrity significantly declined at the highest DEHP concentration (50 µM), and sperm viability exhibited a significant reduction, with sperm viability dropping from 90% in the control to 50% at 50 µM. Functional assays revealed reduced sperm binding to zona pellucida and oviduct epithelial cells at 50 µM, indicating impaired fertilization potential. Conclusion: Our findings revealed the detrimental effects of DEHP exposure on camel sperm function, highlighting its potential threat to reproductive efficiency. These results provide critical insights into the reproductive toxicity of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in livestock. Future investigations should focus on the long-term consequences of DEHP exposure, elucidating the underlying mechanisms, and developing effective mitigation strategies.

Indexed as

CamelusDiethylhexyl PhthalatePlasticizersSpermatozoaAnimalsCell SurvivalEpididymisFemaleMaleSemen AnalysisSperm MotilityZona PellucidaDiethylhexyl PhthalatePlasticizersCamelDEHPEpididymisInfertilitySperm

Identifiers

PMID40557087
PMCPMC12184445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.