Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2025
Effects of Prophylactic Infusion of Equivalent Doses of Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine in Preventing Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension During Cesarean Delivery on Fetal and Maternal Outcomes: A Dual-Center, Non-Inferiority Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of prophylactic constant-rate infusion of norepinephrine or phenylephrine on neonatal outcomes during caesarean section.European journal of medical research · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-09-10Duplication of/in Article · Error in Data · Error in Methods · Euphemisms for Duplication · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Numerous studies have compared the effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on maternal and neonatal outcomes during cesarean delivery. However, the infusion rates are often based on clinical experience, resulting in non-equivalent doses. We aimed to compare the effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine at equivalent doses on fetal and maternal outcomes, and assess their efficacy at the 90% effective dose (ED Methods: A total of 100 parturients scheduled for cesarean delivery were randomly allocated to receive either 0.10 μg/kg/min norepinephrine (Group NE) or 0.60 μg/kg/min phenylephrine (Group PE) to prevent spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. The primary endpoint was neonatal umbilical arterial (UA) pH and the incidence of maternal hypotension, while secondary endpoints included hemodynamic changes within the first 15 minutes, maternal adverse events, and additional neonatal measures. Results: Of the 95 subjects who completed the study, the UA pH in Group NE (7.296 ± 0.041) was found to be non-inferior to Group PE (7.292 ± 0.040), with a mean difference of 0.003 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.016 to 0.022; P = 0.009]. The incidences of hypotension (NE: 8.3% vs PE: 10.6%, P = 0.701), hypertension, nausea, and vomiting were comparable between groups. However, bradycardia incidence was significantly reduced in Group NE compared to Group PE (2.1% vs 12.8%, P = 0.046). The two groups showed no significant difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) at most time points within the first 15 minutes, except at 7 minutes. Group NE also had a higher heart rate (HR) than Group PE in most measurements. Both groups showed similar neonatal outcomes. Conclusion: Prophylactic infusion of 0.10 μg/kg/min norepinephrine was non-inferior to 0.60 μg/kg/min phenylephrine in terms of neonatal UA pH. These findings further support the safety of norepinephrine in obstetric anesthesia, although additional research is warranted to assess its long-term maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.