ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Effects of pneumatic tube systems on viscoelastic coagulation tests in septic patients and healthy individuals: protocol of the randomized controlled VETaPT-trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rapid coagulation assessment is crucial in emergencies, especially with acute bleeding, where timely intervention prevents shock and circulatory failure. Viscoelastic tests (VET) offer real-time insights into clot formation, fibrinolysis, and overall coagulation dynamics, often surpassing conventional lab tests. To accelerate diagnostics, hospitals use pneumatic tube systems (PTS) for blood transport. However, the effect of PTS transport on VET results remains unclear, especially with newer VET technologies and in critically ill patients, who may be more vulnerable to acceleration forces. Objective: The VETaPT (Viscoelastic Testing after Pneumatic Tube Transport) trial investigates whether PTS transport influences results of three next generation VET and platelet function testing in healthy volunteers and critically ill septic patients. It explores if acceleration during transport alters coagulation and platelet function parameters and whether septic patients exhibit increased susceptibility due to their altered coagulation profiles. A goal is to define an acceleration threshold above which PTS-related effects become clinically relevant. This threshold could allow assessment of transport suitability based on force data alone, supporting wider clinical application without repeated blood testing. Study design: This prospective, randomized clinical trial includes both healthy volunteers and critically ill septic patients. Paired blood samples are collected and randomly assigned to either manual or PTS transport, with each subject serving as their own control. Acceleration forces during PTS transport are continuously recorded using a three-axis accelerometer. Samples are analyzed using standard lab tests and following point-of-care devices: ClotPro Expected results: This is the first study to systematically compare multiple next generation VET and platelet aggregation systems in both healthy and septic patients under controlled PTS transport conditions. It is hypothesized that PTS-induced acceleration may alter test results. Identifying a critical threshold could ensure safe, rapid blood transport without compromising diagnostic quality, potentially reducing personnel needs and expediting therapy initiation. Registration: Ethics approval was obtained from the responsible committee of the Technical University Dresden (BO-EK-12012024_1). The study is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00036231).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.