ReviewCureus2025
Microneedling for Anterior Neck Surgical Scars: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness and Evidence Gaps.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neck surgeries often leave anterior neck scars, causing cosmetic and psychological issues. These scars are more exposed to mechanical stress and the environment, potentially leading to hypertrophy, dyschromia, and scar widening. Traditionally, surgical scar interventions have been postponed until full scar maturation, usually between six and 12 months after surgery, but recent evidence indicates that early microneedling may improve collagen remodelling and scar quality. While microneedling has been studied for facial and abdominal scars, its effectiveness on anterior neck scars remains unclear. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches were performed in several databases and registers. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and observational studies assessing microneedling as a standalone intervention for surgical scars, using validated scar assessment tools such as the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Non-surgical scars, combination therapies, and animal studies were excluded. The database searches identified a total of 90 studies. After removing 13 duplicates, 77 studies underwent title and abstract screening, during which 68 were excluded due to irrelevance. The remaining nine articles were evaluated through full-text review; however, all nine articles were subsequently excluded for not meeting eligibility criteria. Ultimately, no studies specifically examining the effect of microneedling on anterior neck scars were eligible for inclusion. Although no direct studies on anterior neck scars exist, evidence from microneedling interventions on surgical scars in other body regions suggests potential benefits for anterior neck scars. Based on this indirect evidence, early intervention with three to six sessions at a depth of 1.0-1.5 mm may optimise scar outcomes. Further targeted research is required to confirm these findings and potentially establish microneedling as a standard management approach for scars following neck surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.