ArticleCureus2025
Decoding the Enigma of Gallbladder Perforation: Exploring Patient Profiles, Diagnosis, and Step-Up Management Pathways.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimGallbladder perforation (GBP) is a serious, life-threatening condition that can result from acute cholecystitis, trauma, or gallstone disease. Diagnosis remains challenging due to its nonspecific symptoms, often mimicking other abdominal pathologies. This study aimed to investigate the clinical features, diagnostic approaches, management strategies, and outcomes of GBP at a tertiary care center.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College (VMMC) and Safdarjung Hospital from January 2022 to February 2025. Patients aged 18 years and older diagnosed with GBP were included, with those with trauma or malignancy excluded. Demographic, clinical, diagnostic, and treatment data were collected and analyzed.
resultsA total of 72 patients were included, predominantly aged >40 years (73.9%), with a higher prevalence in females (67.1%). Diabetes (26.1%) and hypertension (17.8%) were the most common comorbidities. The most frequent symptom was right upper quadrant pain (93%), with a mean presentation time of 18.6 days. Imaging (USG and CT) revealed that 67/72 cases were diagnosed with GBP, with the fundus being the most common site of perforation. Most patients (69.8%) received conservative management with antibiotics, while 16.6% underwent percutaneous drainage procedures. The overall mortality rate was 2.7%.
conclusionsGBP presents with diverse clinical manifestations, and early diagnosis is crucial to reduce complications. Non-resolution of symptoms with significant pericholecystic collection warrants percutaneous drainage, a minimally invasive procedure with low morbidity. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for optimal management, particularly in complex cases requiring interval cholecystectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.