Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40557003›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Role of Machine Learning in Predicting Hospital Readmissions Among General Internal Medicine Patients: A Systematic Review.

Mukul Sharda, Saujas Sharma, Shaunak Raikar, Nathaniel Verhagen, Janavi Wagle, Ritisha Mathur, Saathvik Gowda, Sharath Kommu, Rupesh Prasad, Sanjay Bhandari and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biomarkers in Heart Failure: A Review and a Wish.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mukul ShardaInternal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Saujas SharmaNeuroscience, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Shaunak RaikarChemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.
Nathaniel VerhagenInternal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Janavi WagleScience, Brookfield East High School, Brookfield, USA.
Ritisha MathurScience, Brookfield Academy, Brookfield, USA.
Saathvik GowdaScience, Brookfield Central High School, Brookfield, USA.
Sharath KommuInternal Medicine, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, USA.
Rupesh PrasadInternal Medicine, Aurora Sinai Medical Center, Milwaukee, USA.
Sanjay BhandariInternal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Pinky JhaInternal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospital readmissions contribute significantly to healthcare costs. While traditional regression models for predicting 30-day readmission risk offer modest accuracy, machine learning (ML) presents an opportunity to capture complex relationships in healthcare data, potentially enhancing predictions. This review assesses the role of ML in predicting 30-day readmissions for general internal medicine admissions in the U.S. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search of PubMed (2014-2023) was conducted using the keywords "artificial intelligence," "machine learning," and "readmission." The review focused on ML models predicting readmissions in general internal medicine patients in the U.S. Nine studies were reviewed, covering conditions like acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), pneumonia (PNA), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and other general internal medicine cases. ML models such as artificial neural networks (ANN), random forests (RF), gradient boosting, logistic regression, and natural language processing (NLP) were used. ANN and RF models outperformed traditional regression methods, while NLP-based approaches showed limited success. Subgroup modeling provided marginal improvements in predictive accuracy. In conclusion, ML offers significant potential for improving 30-day readmission predictions by overcoming the limitations of traditional models. ANN and RF are particularly effective in predicting readmissions in general internal medicine. To advance predictive capabilities, future research should refine NLP, subgroup modeling, and focus on model generalizability, integration of diverse data sources, and the development of explainable AI for clinical adoption. Addressing these challenges could transform healthcare delivery, improve patient outcomes, and reduce costs.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencegeneral internal medicinemachine learningreadmissionus based

Identifiers

PMID40557003
PMCPMC12187041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.