ArticleCureus2025
Bone Graft Expansion in Cranioplasty Using a Split-Bone Technique.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) is performed in emergent cases of uncontrollable intracranial hypertension in which noninvasive procedures or medications are not able to safely maintain pressure within the cranium, increasing the risk of morbidity and mortality. The native bone flap is then replaced, a procedure referred to as cranioplasty, nearly three to six months after injury to allow time for brain relaxation. However, in cases with persistent cerebral edema at the time of cranioplasty, techniques are often applied intraoperatively, including mannitol, external ventricular drain, or lumbar drain placement. To avoid the risks of delaying the procedure or drain placement, we demonstrate a novel technique of splitting the bone flap to adequately increase the size and flexibility. Three patients with a mean age of 44 underwent this novel technique during cranioplasty due to persistent brain edema following a DHC. The new operative technique was successfully performed to compensate for the lingering edema, and all three patients were monitored postoperatively, showing no complications. In this study we demonstrate a new technique to alter bone flap size and flexibility during cranioplasty cases with persistent brain edema, avoiding the need for invasive drain placement. All patients experienced no complications or new cranial/skull defects postoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.