Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40556964›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of oncology2025

Time-to-Treatment Initiation and Its Effect on All-Cause Mortality: Insights From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database.

Song Peng Ang, Eunseuk Lee, Jia Ee Chia, Maya Iglesias, Mariela Di Vanna, Shreya Shambhavi, Jose Iglesias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trends, Disparities, and Outcomes in Time to Treatment Initiation in Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Impacts of Hurricane-Related Flooding on Time to Initial Cancer-Directed Treatment in North Carolina.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Song Peng AngDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers Health/Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ, USA.
Eunseuk LeeDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers Health/Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ, USA.
Jia Ee ChiaDivision of Cardiology, Sarver Heart Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Maya IglesiasRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Mariela Di VannaDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers Health/Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ, USA.
Shreya ShambhaviDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers Health/Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ, USA.
Jose IglesiasDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers Health/Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Delays in cancer treatment initiation can significantly impact survival outcomes, but the magnitude of this effect varies by cancer type, stage, and patient demographics. This study examined the association between time-to-treatment initiation (TTI) and all-cause mortality across multiple common cancers, evaluating differential impacts and sociodemographic disparities. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, including 991,771 adults diagnosed with breast, lung, prostate, or colorectal cancers between 2015 and 2020. TTI intervals were divided into four categories: 0 - 1, 2 - 5, 6 - 9, and ≥ 10 months. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, cancer-specific, and treatment factors, assessed the impact of TTI on all-cause mortality, accounting for time-varying covariates. Results: Overall, 63.9% of patients initiated treatment within 1 month. Unadjusted analyses revealed paradoxically lower mortality with longer TTI intervals (26.1% for 0 - 1 month vs. 11.4% for ≥ 10 months). After adjusting for time-varying effects, longer TTI significantly correlated with higher mortality risks (hazard ratio (HR): 1.02 for 2 - 5 months, 1.08 for 6 - 9 months, 1.23 for ≥ 10 months; P < 0.001 each), compared to treatment within 1 month. Older age (HR: 1.06), male gender (HR: 1.08), unmarried status (HR: 1.06), and non-Hispanic Black race (HR: 1.03) were independently associated with increased mortality. Lung cancer patients had significantly higher mortality than breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers (all P < 0.001). Treatment differences emerged, with reduced chemotherapy (40.2% to 10.0%) and surgical interventions (70.6% to 48.8%) at longer intervals. Conclusion: Our analysis showed that increased TTI is independently associated with significantly higher all-cause mortality across major cancers, emphasizing the urgency of timely treatment initiation. Sociodemographic disparities in TTI and outcomes highlight systemic barriers disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations, necessitating targeted interventions to improve equitable cancer care and survival outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast cancerColorectal cancerLung cancerMortalityProstate cancerTime-to-treatment initiation

Identifiers

PMID40556964
PMCPMC12185122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.