ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Research on the impact of delayed retirement on the subjective wellbeing of older adults.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Working out of necessity: how job lock shapes health for older workers.The Gerontologist · 2026Article
- Delayed retirement and low self-worth among older adults: evidence from CLASS.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Digital literacy, work participation, and active aging: evidence on older adults' employment and well-being in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Research on the new mechanism and path of delayed retirement affecting the birth rate.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Prevalence and risk factors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among older hospital cleaners in Wenzhou, China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As China prepares to implement delayed retirement policies in response to population aging, understanding the impact of extended working lives on older adults' wellbeing has become increasingly important. While prior studies have focused on economic outcomes, less is known about the subjective consequences of working beyond traditional retirement age. This paper examines the effect of delayed retirement on the subjective wellbeing of older adults in China, with attention to underlying mechanisms and potential heterogeneity across gender and income groups. Using micro-level survey data from a period when delayed retirement was voluntary rather than mandatory, we identify the impact of retirement deferral on subjective wellbeing. We further explore three potential mechanisms and conduct subgroup analyses by gender and household income levels. We find that delayed retirement significantly increases subjective wellbeing among older adults. The improvement appears to result from enhanced social capital and a stronger sense of achievement, while reduced participation in intergenerational caregiving may partly offset the benefits. Gender heterogeneity analysis reveals that the positive effect is significant only for men, likely due to the additional domestic responsibilities faced by women. Similarly, income heterogeneity shows that benefits accrue primarily to higher-income individuals, whereas lower-income individuals experience no significant gains, possibly due to the involuntary nature of their extended work. These findings suggest that delayed retirement has complex effects on wellbeing, shaped by both social roles and economic constraints. Policy efforts should promote flexible and equitable retirement transitions, improve workplace support for older workers, and address the family-level tensions that may arise from extended employment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.