ArticleQatar medical journal2025
Re-expansion pulmonary edema after routine use of cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery: Case report.
Article in Qatar medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Re-expansion pulmonary edema (REPE) is traditionally associated with the resolution of pneumothorax or pleural effusion. Its occurrence after routine cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in cardiac surgery is rare. The incidence of REPE after treatment of pneumothorax or pleural effusion is less than 1%, but it carries a mortality rate of up to 20%. Case Presentation: We present a case of REPE in a 64-year-old male undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Despite an uneventful surgery and standard perioperative management, the patient developed REPE, manifested with increased airway pressures, blood-tinged secretions, and compromised oxygenation post-CPB. Immediate intervention comprising mechanical ventilation adjustments, diuretics, and vasopressor support was initiated to facilitate recovery. The pulmonary edema resolved within 24 hours after the surgery, and the patient was transferred to the surgical high-dependency unit (HDU) on the third postoperative day. Discussion: This case reports a rare occurrence of REPE following routine CPB and highlights the multifactorial pathogenesis involving reperfusion injury and altered pulmonary physiology. Possible mechanisms include reperfusion injury from free radicals, cytokine release, and increased vascular permeability. The management of REPE requires prompt recognition and treatment and involves diuretics, ventilatory adjustments, and hemodynamic monitoring. Conclusion: REPE, though rare post-CPB, requires a high index of suspicion and prompt management to prevent adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.