ArticleACS nanoscience Au2025
Practical Guide to Automated TEM Image Analysis for Increased Accuracy and Precision in the Measurement of Particle Size and Morphology.
Article in ACS nanoscience Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tracking Nano- and Microplastics in Plants: Uptake Pathways, Tissue Distribution, and Analytical Strategies from Microscopy to Spectroscopy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A common desire in nanoscience is to describe the size and morphology of nanoparticles as observed from TEM images. Many times, this analysis is done manually, a lengthy process that is prone to errors and ambiguity in the measurements. While several research groups have reported excellent advances in machine-learned approaches to automated TEM image processing, the tools that they have developed often require specialized software or significant knowledge of coding. This state of affairs means that a majority of researchers in the field of nanoscience are not well-equipped to incorporate these advances into their normal workflows. In this tutorial, we describe how to use Weka segmentation within the free and open source program FIJI to automatically identify and characterize nanoparticles from TEM images. The approach we outline is not meant to discount the excellent results of groups working at the forefront of machine learning image analysis; rather, it is meant to bring similar tools to a broader audience by demonstrating how such processing can be done within the GUI-based interface of FIJIa program already commonly used within nanoscience research. We also discuss the advantages that arise from automatic processing of TEM images, including repeatability, time savings, the ability to process low-contrast images, and the additional types of characterization that can be performed following identification of particles. The overall goal is to provide an accessible tool that enables a more robust and repeatable analysis and descriptions of nanoparticles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.