Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40556817›Full record

ArticleACS nanoscience Au2025

Practical Guide to Automated TEM Image Analysis for Increased Accuracy and Precision in the Measurement of Particle Size and Morphology.

Kristen M Aviles, Benjamin J Lear

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nanoscience Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristen M AvilesDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.
Benjamin J LearDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5624-7991

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common desire in nanoscience is to describe the size and morphology of nanoparticles as observed from TEM images. Many times, this analysis is done manually, a lengthy process that is prone to errors and ambiguity in the measurements. While several research groups have reported excellent advances in machine-learned approaches to automated TEM image processing, the tools that they have developed often require specialized software or significant knowledge of coding. This state of affairs means that a majority of researchers in the field of nanoscience are not well-equipped to incorporate these advances into their normal workflows. In this tutorial, we describe how to use Weka segmentation within the free and open source program FIJI to automatically identify and characterize nanoparticles from TEM images. The approach we outline is not meant to discount the excellent results of groups working at the forefront of machine learning image analysis; rather, it is meant to bring similar tools to a broader audience by demonstrating how such processing can be done within the GUI-based interface of FIJIa program already commonly used within nanoscience research. We also discuss the advantages that arise from automatic processing of TEM images, including repeatability, time savings, the ability to process low-contrast images, and the additional types of characterization that can be performed following identification of particles. The overall goal is to provide an accessible tool that enables a more robust and repeatable analysis and descriptions of nanoparticles.

Indexed as

AIdata visualizationFIJIimage analysisimagingNanoparticlestatisticstransmission electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID40556817
PMCPMC12186846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.