ArticleJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada2024
Extracorporeal Life Support for Severe Leptospirosis: Case Series and Narrative Review.
Article in Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for tropical infections: a scoping review.Journal of intensive care · 2026Review
- Lung Involvement in Patients with Leptospirosis in Tropical Australia; Associations, Clinical Course and Implications for Management.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Leptospirosis in humans and animals in Malaysia: A review from 1976 to 2023.Veterinary world · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Leptospirosis can be associated with multi-system organ failure (MSOF) and significant morbidity and mortality. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has been used as salvage therapy for severe leptospirosis complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Current knowledge in this field is limited, with no standardized treatment approaches. We aim to describe the literature to date on the use of ECLS in patients with leptospirosis, highlighting associations, outcomes, and complications. Methods: We report on the successful use of ECLS in two cases of severe leptospirosis and conduct a narrative review of the literature. Using a search strategy developed in consultation with a medical librarian and validated across pre-selected articles, several databases were searched. We included case reports, case series, cohort studies, and prospective studies of adult patients with confirmed leptospirosis undergoing ECLS. Editorials, surveys, or opinion articles without primary patient data were excluded. Overall mortality was our primary outcome. Results: Two cases of previously healthy males presenting with ARDS due to leptospiral infection are described. Literature review identified 25 articles containing 43 reported cases of patients treated with ECLS for severe leptospirosis. Patients were mostly young and male. Overall mortality was 16%. The most common complication recognized was acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy. Additional complications included diffuse intravascular coagulation, necrotizing pancreatitis, and limb ischemia. Conclusion: Leptospirosis should be considered in patients with epidemiologic exposure(s) presenting with critical illness, including ARDS and MSOF. ECLS is a viable rescue strategy in severe leptospirosis, even with established MSOF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.