Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40556808›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada2024

Clinical Practice Guideline-Supported Administration of Monoclonal Antibody Therapy for High-Risk Patients with COVID-19: Experience of a Quaternary Care Centre.

Keely Hammond, François Bourdeau, Marina Klein, Donald C Vinh, Makeda Semret

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Keely HammondDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
François BourdeauDepartment of Pharmacy, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Marina KleinDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Donald C VinhDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Makeda SemretDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immunocompromised patients remain at risk of progression to severe COVID-19 disease. Methods: We describe clinical COVID-19-related outcomes after administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) following institutional clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in 205 high-risk patients between November 2021 and April 2022 at a Canadian quaternary care centre. Results: Median patient age was 59 years; 102 (50%) were female. Eighty-two (40%) were transplant recipients, 47 (23%) patients had hematologic malignancies, 25 (12%) had solid organ malignancies, and 51 (25%) had another indication. Forty-eight (23%) had received fewer than two doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. The majority (80%) had mild disease at presentation with 14% moderate and 6% severe. Median time from symptom onset to mAb administration was 3 days (IQR 2.0-5.5 days). Of those who received mAb as outpatients, 90 (93%) had favourable clinical outcomes (no COVID-19-related hospitalizations or death within 3 months). Of those who received mAb as inpatients, 93 (86%) had favourable outcomes (discharged without COVID-19-related re-admission or death), 4% were re-admitted, and 10% died. In logistic regression analysis, only disease severity at time of mAb administration was associated with unfavourable outcomes. Fewer than two vaccine doses was not associated with unfavourable outcomes, suggesting potential benefit among the under-vaccinated. There was a significant difference in adherence to CPGs between administration of mAb in outpatients versus inpatients (adherent for 85% versus 58%, Conclusion: CPG-supported mAb administration for management of COVID-19 in high-risk patients was associated with favourable clinical outcomes and may be a useful model to guide future therapies.

Indexed as

COVID-19diseasemAboutcomespatients

Identifiers

PMID40556808
PMCPMC12169441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.