'ARVs is for HIV and cream is for HPV or precancer:' Women's perceptions and perceived acceptability of self-administered topical therapies for cervical precancer treatment: a qualitative study from Kenya.

Background: Women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear a disproportionate burden of cervical cancer, despite being a preventable disease. Prevention efforts in LMICs are hindered in part by lack of access to cervical precancer treatment, due to weak health infrastructure and a lack of adequate human resources to deliver current provider-administered precancer treatments. Innovative strategies are urgently needed to close the cervical precancer treatment gap in LMICs, including the use of self-administered topical therapies such as 5-fluorouracil and imiquimod, for which efficacy evidence is available from high-income settings. We investigated African women's perceptions and perceived acceptability of these therapies for cervical precancer treatment. Methods: Between November 2022 and April 2023, we conducted five focus group discussions (FGDs) with women ages 25-65 years undergoing cervical cancer screening or precancer treatment in Kisumu, Kenya. The FGDs explored women's experiences with screening and precancer treatment, their acceptability of topical therapies for precancer treatment and perceived barriers and facilitators to uptake. The FGDs were moderated by local qualitative research assistants, conducted in local languages, transcribed, coded and analysed using qualitative description using NVIVO software. Results: Twenty-nine women participated, with a mean age of 35.4 years (SD 6.5). All had undergone cervical cancer screening and 25 (83%) had a history of precancer treatment with ablation or excision. Multiple themes were identified related to women's perceptions of topical therapies. Participants were highly receptive to topical treatments, with many favoring the option of self-administration compared to provider-administration of such therapies. Self-administration of topical therapies was felt to help address challenges associated with current treatment methods, including difficulty in access, pain with procedures, cost and lack of privacy with pelvic examinations. Participants had a preference for topical therapies that are used less frequently compared to those used daily. Conclusion: Among Kenyan women with a history of cervical precancer treatment, self-administered topical therapies for precancer are acceptable and have the potential to address barriers, including access, privacy and cost, that hinder precancer treatment in LMICs. If supported by efficacy studies in LMICs, self-administered topical therapies offer a scalable approach to closing the precancer treatment gap in LMICs. Trial registration: Not applicable.