Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40556777›Full record

ReviewACS bio & med chem Au2025

Graphene Oxide in Bone Regenerative Engineering: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.

Fatemeh S Hosseini, Ho-Man Kan, Taraje Whitfield, Chrysoula Argyrou, Amir A Abedini, Nicholas S Allen, Cato T Laurencin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS bio & med chem Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Research progress of electroactivity graphene-based materials in bone repair].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. How Emerging Nanomaterials are Effective in Bone Regeneration?International journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fatemeh S HosseiniThe Cato T. Laurencin Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut 06030, United States.
Ho-Man KanThe Cato T. Laurencin Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut 06030, United States.
Taraje WhitfieldThe Cato T. Laurencin Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut 06030, United States.
Chrysoula ArgyrouThe Cato T. Laurencin Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut 06030, United States.
Amir A AbediniThe Cato T. Laurencin Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut 06030, United States.
Nicholas S AllenThe Cato T. Laurencin Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut 06030, United States.
Cato T LaurencinThe Cato T. Laurencin Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut 06030, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6765-3047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to its exceptional physicochemical and biological properties, graphene oxide (GO), the oxidized form of graphene, has attracted considerable interest in bone regenerative engineering. The oxygen-functional groups on the backbone of GO enable biomolecule adherence, protein adsorption, cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, calcium ion adsorption and bone matrix mineralization. These oxygen functional groups enhance GO's interaction with biological fluids, facilitating its hydrolytic biodegradation. Recent preclinical studies have indicated that GO effectively improves mechanical strength, immunomodulation, and osteoinduction when utilized within diverse matrix structures including natural and synthetic polymers and ceramics to induce osteogenesis. Advanced bone regenerative applications of GO, such as implant coating and delivery of bioactive compounds, have demonstrated enhanced osseointegration, antibacterial efficacy, and pro-healing microenvironments. However, there are still challenges regarding the high-quality large-scale synthesis and long-term biocompatibility of GO. Additionally, the variability in the characteristics of GO resulting from different synthesis methods demonstrates further challenges for therapeutic translation. This study provides a comprehensive review of the recent preclinical research on the translational potential of GO, discussing the convergence of its exceptional properties for use in bone regenerative engineering along with its current challenges and future perspectives.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationClinical TranslationComposite NanomaterialsGraphene OxideOsteogenic DifferentiationOxygen Functional GroupsRegenerativeRegenerative EngineeringScaffoldStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID40556777
PMCPMC12183520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.