ArticleAEM education and training2025
Developing an Outlook on Other Realities: A Curriculum Model Targeting the Importance of Patient Realities in the Emergency Department.
Article in AEM education and training, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing an Outlook on Other Realities: A Curriculum Model Targeting the Importance of Patient Realities in the Emergency Department.AEM education and training · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The DOORs curriculum is designed to equip emergency medicine (EM) residents with the knowledge and skills needed to address social determinants of health (SDH) and provide compassionate, patient-centered care. Vulnerable patient populations often experience disparities in healthcare access and outcomes, furthering a need for a curriculum that fosters awareness, empathy, and resource utilization. The curriculum aims to integrate ethical considerations, social factors, and resource navigation into EM training. Methods: The DOORs curriculum was integrated into the weekly departmental conference, featuring eight or more 30-60-min sessions annually. Initial sessions assessed residents' familiarity with vulnerable populations and available resources. Topics included incarcerated individuals, refugees, homeless patients, sex workers, and others. Sessions included expert lectures, interactive discussions, and ethics case reviews. Resident demographics and pre-existing knowledge were analyzed through surveys. Results: Over 4 years, resident awareness of ED resources improved significantly. In 2020, 52% of residents reported that the curriculum influenced their practice, increasing to 62.5% in 2022. Pre- and post-curriculum surveys demonstrated statistically significant increases in awareness of resources for refugee populations (1.76-2.76) and hemodialysis patients (2.36-3.35). Residents valued sessions with speakers who had lived experiences and highlighted community engagement. Conclusion: The DOORs curriculum works to enhance EM residents' ability to address SDH, utilize resources, and engage in meaningful community partnerships. Future directions include expanding to other specialties and strengthening collaborations with national and local programs to improve SDH education in medical training. Discussion: Our curriculum highlights the value of integrating social determinants of health (SDH) into resident education to deepen awareness and community connection. We found that tailoring content based on resident feedback, particularly emphasizing lived experience and community partnership, was essential for engagement. Notably, strong local support made implementation more feasible and cost-effective than expected, reinforcing the potential for scalability in similar settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.