Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40556715›Full record

ReviewGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2025

Feasibility and acceptability of community-based psychosocial interventions delivered by nonspecialists for perinatal common mental disorders: A systematic review using an implementation science framework.

Prasansa Subba, Pragya Shrestha, Atif Rahman, Nagendra Luitel, Ahmed Waqas, Siham Sikander

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Prasansa SubbaDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6930-7575
Pragya ShresthaResearch Department, Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Atif RahmanDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2066-4467
Nagendra LuitelResearch Department, Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8291-0205
Ahmed WaqasDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3772-194X
Siham SikanderDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0223-7234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Task sharing is endorsed as one of the strategies to address the treatment gap in common perinatal mental health conditions. There is a well-established body of evidence on the effectiveness of psychological interventions delivered by nonspecialist health workers (NSHWs); however, there is a dearth of evidence documenting factors determining the feasibility, acceptability and sustainability of integrating and implementing these interventions. This systematic review aims to synthesize the implementation outcomes and implementation process of NSHWs-delivered psychological interventions for the management of perinatal depression and anxiety using Proctor's implementation science framework outlining eight constructs: feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, adoption, cost, fidelity, penetration and sustainability. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials for studies published in English and between 2000 and 2022 using search terms under five broad categories: (a) "perinatal"; (b) "common mental disorders"; (c) "psychological interventions"; (d) "nonspecialist" and (e) "implementation outcomes." Secondary publications were also hand-searched for data extraction. Two authors independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles. Data for included articles were extracted using a standard data extraction sheet. A narrative synthesis of qualitative evidence was conducted. Initial searches identified 885 articles of which full text of 128 articles were screened for eligibility, with 56 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Out of the eight constructs of Proctor's framework, "feasibility," "acceptability," "appropriateness" and "fidelity" were the most evaluated outcomes. None of the studies reported "penetration" and very few reported "sustainability," "adoption" or "cost." None of the studies used any implementation science framework for the study evaluation. Despite the well-established evidence on the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for perinatal depression and anxiety by NSHWs, these interventions are rarely adopted into the health system. More studies applying systems thinking are needed to explore facilitators, barriers and mechanisms for integrating interventions in the health system. Using implementation science frameworks to design, plan, execute and evaluate psychosocial interventions by NSHWs can address this gap in evidence.

Indexed as

implementation sciencenonspecialistsperinatal anxietyperinatal depressionpsychosocial intervention

Identifiers

PMID40556715
PMCPMC12186571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.