ArticleCancer management and research2025
Effectiveness and Safety of Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy with and without Surgery in Patients with Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer recommended for surgery but treated non-surgically: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Development of a predictive model for pathological complete response following neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy in locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Long-term outcome of neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to retrospectively compare the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy with and without surgery for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: This study included patients with ESCC who received neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy from May 2021 to July 2023. Patients were divided into a surgery cohort and a non-surgery cohort. Outcomes included R0 resection rate, pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), objective response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Among the 61 patients undergoing neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, 33 received subsequent surgery, and 28 did not undergo surgery due to unsuitability or refusal. Totally, 8 (13.1%) achieved complete response, and 38 (62.3%) had partial response, resulting in an overall ORR of 75.4%. In the surgery cohort, the R0 resection rate was 87.9% (29/33), with 24.2% (8/33) achieving pCR and 66.7% (22/33) achieving MPR. The EFS was 23.0 months (95% CI 16.8-NA) for the surgery cohort and 9.2 months (95% CI 6.1-12.8) for the non-surgery cohort. The 2-year OS rates were 65.4% (95% CI 48.7-82.1) and 41.3 (95% CI 22.3-60.3) in the surgery and non-surgery cohorts, respectively. Common adverse events included vomiting (70.5%), nausea (45.9%), and fatigue (19.7%). Common postoperative complications included anastomotic leakage (11.8%) and pulmonary infection (11.8%). Conclusion: Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy represents a promising treatment strategy for patients with locally advanced resectable ESCC, with high rates of R0 resection, pCR and MPR. The subsequent surgery leads to several postoperative complications which can be well-managed, and surgery contributes to improved survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.