ReviewJournal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS2025
Narrative Review of Open Abdomen Management and Comparison of Different Temporary Abdominal Closure Techniques.
Review in Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serial Bogota bag tightening: A pragmatic advance in open abdomen management for resource-limited settings.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Cryopreservation Maintains Structural Integrity and Biomechanical Properties of Human Rectus Fascia for up to 1 mo.Transplantation direct · 2026Article
- Damage Control Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Abdomino-Pelvic Packing in Multimodal Hemorrhage Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The management of an abdomen kept open after life-saving intervention for patients with intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) constitutes an inevitable measure. Various temporary abdominal closure (TAC) techniques have been developed to reduce complications, facilitate re-entry for subsequent procedures, and support improved clinical outcomes. The goal is timely, definitive closure, promoting long-term patient health with full re-establishment of abdominal wall integrity. Methods: This review details TAC techniques and synthesizes guidelines from leading medical organizations. It examines key studies on open abdomen management, identifies research gaps, and proposes future research directions. Results: The TAC techniques include skin closure with clips or sutures, mesh closure and dynamic retention sutures, Wittmann Patch, Bogota Bag, Barker Vacuum Pack, and commercial negative pressure therapy (NPT) systems. Leading organizations such as the Recommendations: Successful management of the open abdomen requires tailored TAC technique selection to meet specific patient needs while considering available resources. Though commercial NPT systems provide better long-term outcomes, traditional methods like the Barker Vacuum Pack remain viable in resource-constrained environments. Future research should prioritize cost-benefit analyses to ensure that high-quality care is aligned with superior clinical outcomes. Conclusion: The document highlights the importance of early diagnosis and closure and emphasizes the need for further studies to optimize surgical techniques and improve cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.