ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2025
C1q monogenic lupus: a case series and review.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Monogenic systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is caused by a single gene mutation. C1q deficiency is a rare but well-documented form of monogenic SLE, characterized by unique clinical and laboratory indicators that guide diagnosis and treatment. We aimed to describe four cases of C1q monogenic lupus. Methods: This retrospective, single-centre observational study reviews the clinical and serological profiles and outcomes of four cases of C1q Monogenic Lupus diagnosed at our centre. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee at the Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (IPGMER), Kolkata-700020 (Memo No. IPGME&R/IEC/2025/0020). Results: We describe four cases of C1Q monogenic lupus identified by whole exome sequencing. All patients exhibited mucocutaneous involvement, discoid lupus erythematosus, inflammatory polyarthritis, normal serum complements C3 and C4, coarse-speckled Antinuclear antibody positivity and antibodies to ribonucleoprotein. Unique features identified include brain parenchymal calcification in one case, chronic subdural haemorrhage in two cases, infection complicated by macrophage activation syndrome in two cases and myositis in one case. Patients were treated with conventional immunosuppressive therapy (glucocorticoids, mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide) and Fresh Frozen Plasma. Our findings were compared with existing literature on C1q deficiency, noting frequent presentations with mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal manifestations, normal C3 and C4 levels and absence of anti-dsDNA antibodies. Conclusion: C1Q Monogenic SLE should be suspected in juvenile SLE patients presenting at under 10 years, with a family history of consanguinity, predominant mucocutaneous manifestations, a history of recurrent infection, normal serum complements and absence of C1q staining in direct immunofluorescence of renal biopsy. In our series, autoimmune manifestations responded well to immunosuppressive therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.