ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Optimizing outcomes in intracranial ependymoma: a contemporary review.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- East Asian multi-centre study on clinical long-term outcomes of postoperative proton beam therapy for localised paediatric intracranial ependymoma.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Supratentorial ependymoma: a comprehensive review of molecular classification, management strategies, and clinical outcomes (Part II of pediatric ependymomas across compartments).Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- A highly abundant circular RNA from the RMST locus plays a role in posterior fossa ependymoma pathogenesis.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Surgical debulking with fertility preservation in primary extra-neural ependymoma presenting with widespread peritoneal and intra-abdominal disease: Case report and literature review.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Article
- Thoracic metastasis of a pediatric posterior fossa group A ependymoma: a rare case and literature review.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2026Article
- Anatomically Precise Microsurgical Resection of a Posterior Fossa Cerebellar Metastasis in an Elderly Patient with Preservation of Venous Outflow, Dentate Nucleus, and Cerebrospinal Fluid Pathways.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Challenges and Innovations in Paediatric Brain Tumour Treatments.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Pharmacological Phase I Clinical Trials in Pediatric Brain Tumors (1990-2024): A Historical Perspective.Oncology research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial ependymomas are glial tumors arising from the ependymal lining of the ventricular system, most commonly affecting young children (median age: 5 years), though they can occur across all age groups. Typically located in the posterior fossa, they account for fewer than 10% of pediatric central nervous system neoplasms and show a slight male predominance. Clinical symptoms vary by location, with posterior fossa tumors often causing hydrocephalus-related signs, and supratentorial lesions presenting with seizures or focal deficits. The 2021 WHO CNS5 classification integrates histologic, anatomic, and molecular features, distinguishing prognostically significant subgroups such as posterior fossa group A (PFA) and supratentorial ZFTA-fusion ependymomas. Diagnosis requires histologic confirmation, aided by MRI and cerebrospinal fluid analysis, with dissemination present in up to 10% of cases at diagnosis. Maximal safe surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment. Children over one year with grade 2 or 3 tumors typically receive adjuvant focal radiotherapy, while chemotherapy is used to delay irradiation in infants or after subtotal resection. Disseminated disease may require craniospinal irradiation or systemic therapy. Despite multimodal treatment, prognosis remains guarded. Ten-year overall survival ranges from 50% to 75%, influenced by extent of resection, molecular subtype, and age. This review synthesizes current knowledge of ependymoma pathogenesis, classification, diagnosis, and therapy, highlighting the growing role of molecular profiling and the importance of specialized, multidisciplinary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.