Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40556655›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2025

Research on interdisciplinary measurement and evolutionary path in the field of ophthalmology.

Lu Chunji, Liu Yuwei, Zhang Fangyuan, Nie Zihan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lu Chunji *Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Liu YuweiInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhang FangyuanInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Nie ZihanBeijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Interdisciplinary collaboration is an inevitable trend in solving complex problems. As medical research deepens, the integration of theories, methods, and technologies from other disciplines with medicine has become an effective means to promote the development of medical research and address issues in the medical field. Objective: There are significant differences in disciplinary intersections in different subfields of medicine, and this study, using ophthalmology as an example, aims to tap into the complex interrelationships between ophthalmology and other disciplines, to reveal interdisciplinary themes in ophthalmology, and to track the development and evolution of trans-ophthalmologic research. Methods: This article takes ophthalmology as an example and uses the Rao-Stirling index to calculate the disciplinary distribution of journals cited in the literature of this field. By setting a threshold, it identifies interdisciplinary literature. Based on the LDA model, it conducts topic identification for the interdisciplinary literature to discover the interdisciplinary themes. Furthermore, it analyzes the evolution trends of these themes using the principle of similarity and visualizes the evolutionary paths. Results: The paper successfully linked 85,401 pieces of literature with WOS subject classifications, involving a total of 250 WOS subjects. The top 10 cited subjects are: Ophthalmology, Neurosciences, Surgery, Multidisciplinary Sciences, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Psychology, Medicine: Genetics & Heredity, Cell Biology, Genetics & Heredity, Clinical Neurology. A total of 18,573 pieces of literature with a Rao-Stirling index greater than 0.7 were selected as high interdisciplinary literature in Ophthalmology. The literature was divided into time slices of two years each, and scores for thematic coherence and thematic perplexity were calculated. Ultimately, twelve themes were identified for 2014-2015, eleven themes for 2016-2017, eleven themes for 2018-2019, ten themes for 2020-2021, and nine themes for 2022-2023. Based on the calculation of thematic similarity, three main evolutionary paths were summarized. The evolutionary paths are: "1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 1-5, 1-6, 1-9,1-10→2-1, 2-4, 2-7, 2-8, 2-9, 2-10→3-4, 3-8, 3-10→4-1, 4-5, 4-8, 4-10→5-5, 5-8, 5-9", "1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 1-5, 1-6, 1-9,1-10→2-1, 2-4, 2-7, 2-8, 2-9, 2-10→3-4, 3-8, 3-10→4-1, 4-5, 4-8, 4-10→5-5, 5-8, 5-9". Conclusions: This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of interdisciplinary themes in ophthalmology through the application of the Rao-Stirling index and the LDA model, revealing trends of multidisciplinary collaboration and evolving topics. To facilitate the integration of these themes, the research proposes several recommendations: first, to promote interdisciplinary collaboration in order to establish an innovative ecosystem that spans various fields; second, to develop a systematic funding framework for research and enhance the evaluation system for interdisciplinary projects; third, to implement reforms in ophthalmic education aimed at strengthening the cultivation of interdisciplinary talent; and fourth, to expand the scope of academic journal inclusions by establishing dedicated sections for interdisciplinary research.

Indexed as

biochemistry & molecular biologycell biologygenetics & hereditymedicine: genetics & hereditymultidisciplinary sciencesneurosciencespsychologysurgery

Identifiers

PMID40556655
PMCPMC12186160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.