Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40556654›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025

Targeting synaptic plasticity to bridge translational gaps in sepsis-associated encephalopathy.

Koji Hoshino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Koji HoshinoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a frequent yet underrecognized complication of sepsis that significantly contributes to long-term cognitive dysfunction in survivors. Despite advances in sepsis management, there is currently no established therapy targeting SAE, and translational gaps between basic and clinical research persist. Rodent models of sepsis suffer from variability in immune responses and poor translational fidelity. Moreover, behavioral tests commonly used to assess cognition in animal models are often confounded by sepsis-induced sickness behaviors and depression-like phenotypes, especially during the acute phase. Given these limitations, targeting synaptic plasticity-both mechanistically and therapeutically-has emerged as a promising approach. Accumulating evidence indicates that SAE arises from neuroinflammation triggered by systemic inflammation, in which activated microglia and subsequent cytokine signaling contribute to neuronal dysfunction and lead to impaired hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP), a fundamental mechanism of learning and memory. Importantly, electrophysiological studies have shown that LTP impairment occurs within hours to days after sepsis onset, highlighting its potential as an early and sensitive biomarker for SAE. Recent experimental interventions, including low-intensity exercise, environmental enrichment, and modulation of gut microbiota, have shown beneficial effects on SAE. These findings underscore the need for integrative, multimodal strategies that address the complex pathophysiology of SAE. Synaptic plasticity, particularly LTP, may serve not only as a functional readout of neuroinflammatory damage but also as a modifiable target for early intervention. This review highlights the translational challenges in current SAE research and advocates for a paradigm shift toward mechanism-driven and plasticity-focused therapeutic development.

Indexed as

hippocampuslong-term potentiationneuroinflammationsepsis-associated encephalopathysynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID40556654
PMCPMC12185269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.