ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Analysis of the level of polypharmacy in patients from an isolated rural area: effect of age, sex, and chronic diseases.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The increase in life expectancy and the greater number of chronic diseases have led to a greater use of medications. This polypharmacy can cause a greater number of drug-related problems and negative results on the patient's health associated with medication, which is why most health services are focused on solving these problems. Machine learning uses different techniques to generate knowledge in health, one of them is regression, whose model establishes that a prognosis is created from a dependent variable and a series of independent variables. Materials and methods: Data collection was conducted during 2021-2022 in an isolated rural pharmacy. The screening of participants susceptible to being part of the study began at the time of dispensing, verifying that they were part of the personalized dosing system (PDS) service. Results: The study population consisted of 78 participants, predominantly female. The sociodemographic profile was characterized by being female, between 66 and 80 years of age. The number of chronic diseases per participant was 4.25 ± 1.49. During the study phase, a total of 450 drug-related problems (DRPs) were detected, with an average of 5.64 ± 2.69 DRPs per participant. Discussion: Age and the assigned polypharmacy level are the factors that most influence the final polypharmacy level. However, it is necessary to include the variable "chronic diseases" since in some situations it seems to be significant. Conclusion: The factors that most influence the polypharmacy index are patient age and initial polypharmacy level and, to a lesser extent, but no less important, the number of chronic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.