Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40556546›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025

Exploring the Design Space of Machine Learning Models for Quantum Chemistry with a Fully Differentiable Framework.

Divya Suman, Jigyasa Nigam, Sandra Saade, Paolo Pegolo, Hanna Türk, Xing Zhang, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, Michele Ceriotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Predictive free energy simulations through hierarchical distillation of quantum Hamiltonians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Representative Random Sampling of Chemical Space.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  3. Weighted active space protocol for multireference machine-learned potentials.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Divya SumanLaboratory of Computational Science and Modeling, Institut des Matériaux, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0009-1483-8959
Jigyasa NigamLaboratory of Computational Science and Modeling, Institut des Matériaux, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6857-4332
Sandra SaadeLaboratory of Computational Science and Modeling, Institut des Matériaux, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0008-6163-0758
Paolo PegoloLaboratory of Computational Science and Modeling, Institut des Matériaux, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1491-8229
Hanna TürkLaboratory of Computational Science and Modeling, Institut des Matériaux, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Xing ZhangDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
Garnet Kin-Lic ChanDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8009-6038
Michele CeriottiLaboratory of Computational Science and Modeling, Institut des Matériaux, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2571-2832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional atomistic machine learning (ML) models serve as surrogates for quantum mechanical (QM) properties, predicting quantities such as dipole moments and polarizabilities directly from compositions and geometries of atomic configurations. With the emergence of ML approaches to predict the "ingredients" of a QM calculation, such as the ground-state charge density or the effective single-particle Hamiltonian, it has become possible to obtain multiple properties through analytical physics-based operations on these intermediate ML predictions. We present a framework that seamlessly integrates the prediction of an effective electronic Hamiltonian, for both molecular and condensed-phase systems, with PySCFAD, a differentiable QM workflow. This integration facilitates training models indirectly against functions of the Hamiltonian, such as electronic energy levels, dipole moments, polarizability, etc. We then use this framework to explore various possible choices within the design space of hybrid ML/QM models, examining the influence of incorporating multiple targets on model performance and learning a reduced-basis ML Hamiltonian that can reproduce targets computed on a much larger basis. Our benchmarks evaluate the accuracy and transferability of these hybrid models, compare them against predictions of atomic properties from their surrogate models, and provide indications to guide the design of the interface between the ML and QM components of the model.

Identifiers

PMID40556546
PMCPMC12243086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.